On that test, though, M1 was running Photoshop through Apple's Rosetta 2 translation software, which isn't as fast as running native software built for the chip. On Intel's test, its Windows machine using a 3GHz quad-core Intel chip was 1.5 times faster than an M1 Mac. (Apple's Intel-based MacBooks use 10th Gen Core chips.) One specific test involved Photoshop's content aware fill technology, one of the tests Adobe cited. In that market, though, processors from Intel and AMD are more competitive.įor its part, Intel in February offered its own set of speed tests showing where its newer 11th Gen Core chips, code-named Tiger Lake, outdo M1 Macs. There, it's expected to offer chips with more processing cores than the M1's four powerful cores and four power-efficient cores. Tower computers using its M series of processors. It lacks the Pro's larger battery, slightly brighter screen, cooling fan for sustained heavy work and, in low-end Air configurations, a bit of graphics processing performance.Īpple has yet to release larger, more powerful Budget buyers should note that the M1-based MacBook Air likely offers similar performance. The Intel-based machine used a Core i7 processor, though Macs don't ship with the latest models from Intel. Pros with 16GB of RAM, 2TB SSDs and Mac OS 11.2.2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |